Welcome to Éire Literature! I’m using this page to share my personal works while I’m in college and have the time to write freely. Hope you enjoy!

Tag: books

  • Even Statues of Women Aren’t Safe

    The famous statue of Molly Malone resembles a woman in a long dress pushing a cart in central Dublin. It was unveiled in 1988 to celebrate the city’s millennium on Grafton Street before being moved to Suffolk Street around 2014. The figure is supposed to portray the woman in the city’s unofficial anthem of “Cockles and Muscles.” The simple folk song is about Molly Malone, a fish merchant like the rest of her family, but she dies young from fever. She’s been a symbol of Irish pride and a reminder of the hardships the country has overcome. This attention led her to become a popular tourist attraction for visitors, both Irish and foreigners. 

    Once images and videos of this statue started to appear online in 2022, it became a media sensation, but not for a good reason. Other tourist attractions, like the Blarney Stone, are meant to be touched for good luck, but Molly’s statue was rusted everywhere except for her breasts. People all across the globe started to vocalize how degrading and disgusting the normalized custom was. Instead of taking a photo with her, tourists were rubbing the statue of a young woman’s breasts for good luck. This sensation began to reach media outlets in Ireland as well as overseas. Thousands were outraged and began to stop people in public from participating in the long-running tradition. 

    Numerous women were instead posting videos on different online platforms holding Molly Malone’s hand instead of her breasts out of respect and protection for her. Blatantly demonstrating how even a statue of a woman isn’t able to get respect. Tourists and influencers tried to guide things in a positive direction, encouraging future tourists visiting Dublin to hold her hand instead. Women during the annual St. Patrick’s Day parade held Molly Malone’s hand and covered her bust with flowers or necklaces. The city had Gardaí (Police Force) on each side of the statue during the month of May 2025 to halt citizens from violating the statue in an attempt to educate visitors. Even a young woman at Trinity College Dublin, who often busks on Suffolk Street, started a campaign titled “Leave Molly mAlone.”

    After continuous attention, Dublin City Council decided to refurbish the statue in early October 2025. It was cleaned, and the bronze was restored to her chest, then unveiled on October 10-11 of 2025. The once humiliating and derogatory tradition was starting to be put to rest. Media outlets and Irish citizens were satisfied with the refurbishment as well as the acknowledgement from the city, and started to move on. The media posts have since ground to a halt, and news stations have stopped reporting it. 

    The one thing I’ve yet to see covered is the statue now, after the restoration. The media is often fast-moving, and viral pieces or stories start to be forgotten, but Molly Malone shouldn’t be. As of late 2026, the statue is already starting to fade on her breasts once again. As much as the online feminist movement tried to change the tradition to holding her hand, it hasn’t worked, and the practice is still occurring. We are in a so-called “time of equality and progression,” but these repeated small acts show how far we still need to come. The tradition of Molly Malone is just one example of misogyny embedded in our history and society. Attention needs to remain on stories like this so people are held accountable and continue to shed light on normalized sexism. 


    Her Campus – Chapman University

    Erin Sweeney – Staff Writer

    @hercampuschapman

    https://www.hercampus.com/school/chapman/even-statues-of-women-arent-safe/

  • The Power of Women Writing

    The literary art of this period reveals that female agency was suppressed by social expectations, but writing became a powerful tool for resistance and identity. Emily Dickinson, Fanny Fern, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton are prime examples of this era. In a society shaped by “The Cult of True Womanhood” as defined by Barbara Welter, women were only allowed to have piety, purity, submissiveness, and domesticity. Any other traits, like intelligence or ambition, were purely male traits that women couldn’t possess. They weren’t allowed any kind of authority, and even writing for pleasure was seen as too complicated for the “delicate” female mind. Dickinson, Fern, and Stanton each show these limitations placed on women in different ways, as well as incorporating their own experiences into their work. Many pieces also imagine a world without these restrictions, where women have absolute autonomy. Using innovative language, rhetoric, literary techniques, and persuasion, they transform writing into a tool of female empowerment. 

    Emily Dickinson’s literature demonstrated her hardships as a woman, even though much of her work wasn’t published during her lifetime. She wasn’t capable of living under the “4 virtues,” and her idea of real female traits shows through in her poetry. Women were seen simply as caretakers, mothers, and wives. Dickinson didn’t fit into any of these categories and devoted her life to her work, showing us how rare it was for this time period. Her poetry focuses on the trueness of the inner self and having authority over one’s own being. She wrote in a nontraditional poetry format, with compressed lines, unconventional punctuation, and intense metaphors. Dickinson’s formal rebellion in her art clearly shows her resistance to social expectations, and that she refuses to give in to them. In the poem “They Shut me up in Prose,” she compares confinement to imprisonment; she changed domestic confinement into artistic independence, and she didn’t feel chained like a housewife would to her home and family. She uses striking comparisons like, “They put me in the closet – Because they liked me ‘still.” It was a simple way to express her captivity as being a little kid in a closet. Society attempts to contain female imagination and art. The poem rejects that confinement through intellectual confidence, something that directly challenged “The Cult of True Womanhood.” 

    Dickinson uses agency through inward expression, while Fanny Fern used public satire in a clever way to confront the social as well as economic dependence forced upon women. Fern became famous through newspaper columns and essays that challenged gender equality in direct but humorous language. Women were only allowed to write books about homemaking, childcare, creative stories that always ended with marriage, or, on the rare occasion, humor. Serious works by female authors weren’t taken seriously, so Fern took it into her own hands to reach the public. Fern also strayed from “The Cult of True Womanhood.” Her voice is sharp, direct, and critical. Not a hint of submissiveness throughout any of her pieces. She frequently wrote about marriage and how it often leaves women financially and socially vulnerable. She openly mocks the assumption that women are only useful for serving their husbands and families. She reveals the hypocrisy through humor of the “sentimental” ideals of 1800’s feminism. Fern uses satire to cover every true statement and judgment of sexist norms throughout her seemingly lighthearted writing. Her famous piece “Aunt Hetty on Matrimony” contributed to her success in the writing world. She states that marriage is the “hardest way on earth of getting a living.” Fern’s career as a successful and paid writer continues to demonstrate her agency and ambition to achieve. She didn’t just write about independence; she achieved it through being a writer as well as expressing her beliefs, showing other women that it is possible. Women can claim power not only through thought and writing but by participating in society and letting their opinions be known. 

    Elizabeth Cady Stanton made perhaps the most direct challenge to women’s lack of agency by turning her writing into straight political activism. She rejected the belief that women should be excluded from civil life and should focus purely on homemaking. In her “Declaration of Sentiments,” she uses very similar language to The Declaration of Independence and directs the powerful speech straight to women’s rights. Each reader can feel the importance of the issues she raised by using such an important American document as a reference. This rhetorical strategy uses the nation’s founding ideals against the system that suppresses women, contradicting the freedom that The Declaration of Independence describes. She states, “all men and women are created equal,” changing the famous line to further push her notions. Stanton exposes the inconsistencies between democratic principles and the legal oppression of women. Her prose recounts injustices of women; lack of voting rights, restricted property rights, and exclusion from education, as well as most career paths. Stanton doesn’t portray the women of America as helpless victims but rather as rational political citizens deserving of equal citizenship. She maintains that women should have authority in the home, workplace, and government.

    These powerful writers utilize different strategies for resisting the same oppression. Dickinson finds power in the autonomy of the mind and in freedom of expression. Fern deploys satire and journalism to challenge domestic ideology and economic dependence geared toward the general public. Staton applies political rhetoric to her writing in order to demand structural change and legal equality for women. All three respond differently to “The Cult of True Womanhood” and their interpretation of the “4 virtues.” Yet they all reject the idea that a woman’s highest virtues are silence and submission. They show and represent women as thinkers, critics, creators, and citizens. 

    Literature in the 1800’s makes it clear that women didn’t have agency and were often constrained, but never successfully erased. Emily Dickinson, Fanny Fern, and Elizabeth Cady Stanton demonstrate that writing itself is a form of power in a society trying to limit female voices. Through poetry, satire, and political declaration, these authors changed language into strong resistance. Their pieces not only critique the limitations of their era but also show the possibilities for women in the future. 


    Works Cited

    Brandenburg, Vicki. “Aunt Hetty on Matrimony.” Maricopa.edu, Pressbooks, 2024, open.maricopa.edu/americanliteraturebefore1860/chapter/aunt-hetty-on-matrimony/.

    Dickinson, Emily. “They Shut Me up in Prose – (445) by Emily Dickinson.” Poetry Foundation, 23 Feb. 2020, http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/52196/they-shut-me-up-in-prose-445.

    Stanton, Elizabeth Cady. Declaration of Sentiments. 1848.

    “The Norton Anthology of English Literature.” Wwnorton.com, 2024, wwnorton.com/books/9781324062981.

    Welter, Barbara. “The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820-1860.” American Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 2, 1966, pp. 151–174, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2711179, https://doi.org/10.2307/2711179.